Uncommonschools.org defines
a charter schools as “an independently run
public school granted greater flexibility in its operations, in return for
greater accountability for performance.” Not all charter schools are the
same, they each have different “charters” which are the missions and goals of
each school. Many people assume that charter schools are private institutions
that just swallow up public funds that could be going towards improving public
schools. To begin, charter schools receive less per
pupil funding than public schools. CCSA.org states that the money that
is allocated to charter schools does not come out of school districts' budgets.
The state and the federal government allocate education funds based on the
number of students, their grade level and their needs.
The
positives of charter school education revolves around the fact that each school
can create its own educational methodology. In other words, it allows freedom
and creativity for teaching and learning methods for both teachers and
students. There tends to be more individualized attention given at Charter
schools than given at public schools. Only two days ago, Massachusetts voted on
whether there would be a major expansion of charter schools within the state. The
results showed that NO, we as a state rejected this ballot question.
Now, these
results show two things about the people of Massachusetts. One: it shows that
we are concerned about the overall quality of public schools. Two: we are bias
towards public schools. It is a great thing for us to be worried about the
decay of public schools because of charter schools- only that it is not a fact
public schools would decrease in quality. Public schools don’t even use all of
the funding that is given to them. We are bias towards public schools because
that is where the majority of our children and teenagers attend. But many public
schools fail to properly educate many students, whether it be the school or the
student’s fault. Public school’s education is generalized and charter school’s
education is more individualized. Maybe charter school expansion is what we
would have needed to heighten the success of our students.
"Public schools don’t even use all of the funding that is given to them."
ReplyDeleteCitation, please.
"But many public schools fail to properly educate many students"
Glittering generality.
You're correct that charter schools can allow for more experimentation with different forms of education which can be good for students, but I think you're missing an important party in the debate over charter schools: teacher's unions.
ReplyDelete"But many public schools fail to properly educate many students, whether it be the school or the student’s fault."
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this, but where are you getting the facts for this?
You might also consider where the money in support of both Yes and No is coming from. (http://www.wbur.org/edify/2016/10/27/where-the-money-comes-from-in-the-fight-over-charter-schools)